When given an article to read from class, the first time I read it over, I mark up anything that I feel is interesting and the first read is more just to understand content without digging deeper into what is really happening. That way I can see the large picture without seeing any of the little things for the first read. Normally I would go through the article again and look more for the little details like if the author seems particularly bias in anyway or if there is this theme throughout the article that would hint at any type of feeling because normally an author has some sort of message for you. I don’t tend to annotate at all when I go through again because I can’t focus on reading the smaller ideas if I take the time to pause and mark up a page so I never really annotate the second time through. Any mark ups made after that are ideas from when I am writing about that article or if something comes up in class. When I make my marks, they are more about the bigger things in the article so they are not as important to what I need to know but more just things I want to stick in my mind every time I go through the article so my marks don’t really mean much when it comes to interrogating an article. As for when it comes to discussion, I am unsure when to jump into a conversation and then second guess myself so I never end up saying anything because I convince myself that everything that I want to say has already been said so nothing ever comes out. I guess in that way, I can’t say that I interrogate articles too well but more for a way for myself to understand the larger picture of the article and just end up leaving it there.